| By Tiara Etheridge/Hub blogger | |
| Posted 5:42 p.m., Aug. 23, 2007 | E-Mail Article • Print Article • Post Comment |
The implications of biotechnology
Although the echoes of biotechnology have reverberated through national media over the past decades with the birth of the cloned sheep, Dolly, in 1997 and the progress of the Human Genome Project and proteomics, the study of the proteins that activate genes, I have been fairly ignorant of the issue until I read some selections by the President's Council on Bioethics.
From the few articles that I have read about the ethical aspect of biotechnology, I have only garnered a sense of confusion.
Kurt Finsterbusch, a sociologist, perfectly conveyed my indecision when he wrote, "I am not on firm ground discussing the issue of how biotechnology should or should not be used…The nation does not know what to think about this issue, at least not in a coherent way.”
However, reading the report commissioned by George Bush on the topic gave me some insight.
Toward the beginning of the report, I couldn't help but be swayed by the President's Council on Bioethics.
They painted such a rosy picture, replete with perfect bodies immune from illness and enhanced to genetic perfection.
Then I reached the section discussing the possible use of biotechnology to select or reject embryos based upon preferred genetic components.
Although the possibility of parents actually designing their children's genetic composition has been mentioned in theory by renowned scientists, such technology seems far-fetched in the near future, considering that many human characteristics are a result of socialization. However, the authors of the report said selecting the perfect embryo seems very plausible with the recent advances in biotechnology.
I find this unsettling because I can't help but think both of my parents would have rejected me as an embryo.
More likely, they would have skipped me over for my younger sister, Starlet: beautiful, flawless skin and thick silky brown hair, super intelligent with a ridiculously high I.Q., funny, artistic and a fast learner.
My genetic strand would have looked a little undesirable compared to hers: Plain looks, mousy brown hair that always tangles, a hard worker but not quick-witted, average intelligence and severely near-sighted. (My sister used to call me Helen Keller when she got mad.)
The thought that my parents could have rejected me in the embryo state because of my genetic fallings is nothing short of disheartening.
With the advent of biotechnology, I would have probably ceased to exist.
I would never have felt the joy of accomplishment, of being in love and having that love returned, of living recklessly in the moment.
I also wouldn't have felt the bittersweet pain of life, the anxiety of stepping outside the comfort zone and achieving the rewards of challenging myself. My parents wouldn't have know in my embryotic state that I would make them laugh, that I adored animals, that I would become the peace-maker in the family, that they would truly love me. Sure, I had my shortcomings, but they made my personality unique, my character richer.
I guess if one truly wanted, he/she could legitimize passing over the inferior child for the genetically blessed, but I can't help but think that such an action would undermine humanity itself.
Genetic enhancements would deprive us of the ability to succeed by our own efforts and therefore take the responsibility, be it praise or criticism, for our actions.
I particularly liked what one of the co-authors of the report, Michael Sandel said in opposition to "selective embryo, designer baby" argument, "To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, not as objects of our design or products of our will or instruments of our ambition.”
Sandel also made a very good point in saying that parents who were not open to the "unbidden," that is open to whatever child the genetic lottery presented them, would be confronted with new responsibility for traits that they did or did not endow upon their children.
Parents, however, do not have to be passive in the face of genetic illness to appreciate their children as gifts.
Although biotherapy that enhances characteristics such as muscle mass and intelligence may diminish the value of human individuality, scientific technology that improves one's health or the health of a child is prudent and should be a no-brainer.
I also fear genetic enhancement would inevitably broaden the wide gap between the nation's poor and rich.
The rich, who could afford the enhancements, would purchase the characteristics that made them economically successful, making it that much harder for the most driven kids from the ghetto or the trailer park to succeed.
Whereas the middle or lower-class child may study for hours, the upper-class child with a genetically enhanced I.Q. would barely have to try.
I can only see this translating into an unfair competitive advantage in the workforce, where the poor face marginal opportunities for advancement and the rich seem socialized for success.
Biotherapy is a complex issue, and my tidbit just covers one fragment of a greater pie. Scientists say we can use this technology to cure cancer, diabetes, and Alzheimer's disease.
In addition, scientists say we could genetically enhance our muscle mass, intelligence, artistic tendencies and any other desirable characteristic. Although I feel that such "perfection" among the masses would dilute the value of such characteristics, each person must draw their own conclusions. It's a complex topic, and there's plenty of room for debate.
Tuesday, 8:04 p.m., Nov. 13
Affirmative action is an effort to remedy years of discrimination
Spencer Gainey wrote an interesting article last week about a petition that is circulating in Oklahoma that seeks to end affirmative action.
I have always found the arguments for ending affirmative action short-sighted and narrow-minded. Opponents of affirmative action claim that showing preference to minority or female workers violates their civil rights as Americans.
First of all, white males still dominate the employment and education pool. Affirmative action is merely an effort to put a dent in decades of discriminatory hiring practices against minorities and women. American Studies Scholar George Lipsitz said it best, "Because discrimination in hiring did not magically cease with the passage of the 1964 [Civil Rights] Bill, employees who had benefited from discrimination since 1964 also got to retain seniority rights they had accrued, while others had to struggle against overt and covert discrimination in order to get jobs with lesser seniority." When layoffs occurred, guess who lost their jobs: those with the least seniority- African Americans and women, which perpetuated the cycle of discrimination and reinforced the power of those who benefited from past discriminatory practices.
Now people our age will say, "That has nothing to do with me." It's easy to relegate discrimination to the Civil Rights Movement, but it's a pervasive force that allows whites to continue holding higher positions.
Because of measures like the Paperwork Reduction Act which excused HUD from gathering information on the racial identities of participants in its housing programs and the Reagan Administration's refusal to enforce the 1975 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act, minority groups were routinely denied loans and forced to live in racially segregated neighborhoods. The property tax assessments used to fund education denied minority groups the educational opportunities provided white children who lived in more expensive homes as a result of these discriminatory home loan practices.
The gap between the rich and poor continued undeterred, despite rhetoric of equal opportunities, because white parents were able to pass on to their children property, equity and financial advantages- the very things denied other groups of children because of discriminatory home loans mentioned above.
For those who still insist that to choose a less qualified minority member or woman over a more qualified white man is racist or sexist, please explain to me why you don't in the same breath complain about the rich, less-qualified kids who get accepted into college because their parents donate huge sums to the school or the less-qualified white men who get jobs because of connections.
We can never be on an equal level in employment and education opportunities, as the American Civil Rights Institute claims it seeks through eliminating affirmative action, until we acknowledge the deeply-rooted problems in public policy that discriminate against minority groups, particularly African Americans, and women, relegating them to static positions on the economic totem pole. We must insist our politicians create measures that truly address discrimination and establish equality.
Will we let resistance toward affirmative action renegotiate antidiscrimination laws so that efforts to combat discrimination are now discriminatory?
Frankly, the world is still a mighty friendly place for a white guy and signing this petition mocks the people who continue to be repressed.
Tuesday, 10:20 p.m., Nov. 6
Four deer on the road
The Monday before last, my fiance's mother and sister hydroplaned and hit a semi truck head-on on the interstate, and the family and I spent the evening at Norman Regional Hospital. Luckily, they survived with only cuts and bruises.
Tuesday, I lost my keys while shooting footage for my Electronic Newsgathering class. Then my hearing aid battery died, and my only replacement batteries were in the car, which was locked. I went all over campus searching for my keys, and I couldn't even hear the people when they asked me questions or replied, "Nope, haven't seen 'em." Frustrating.
To make matters worse, all the car dealerships were closed, so I was looking at spending the night in Norman, a good two hours from my house. This was kind of scary to me because I don't know very many people. To make a long story short, a parking ticket for an unpaid meter (it's hard to move a car without keys), a car tow and $350 later, I got a new set of keys. It was a lot of stress and a lot of wasted money I didn't really have.
Then Sunday, my cat, Sammy, died. He was really old, and he was down to 3 pounds, but he was such a gentleman. He would touch my knee with his paw, his way of asking permission to hop onto my lap. My sister found him dead in the laundryroom.
Then last Monday, my teacher blew up at my camera partner and kept us in class for an hour as our source waited outside our classroom. By the time we got out, the source was ready to leave. We convinced him to give us a few minutes. We miked him, set up the audio levels and tripod, but the camera wouldn't work. So we had no soundbite, no source, and our story was due in two days.
That evening, one of the editors ripped apart a story I had worked on for three weeks. I felt like the worst writer to walk through The Daily's doors. To make matters worse, he was right. All of his criticims were dead-on. I felt like a failure.
Today while I was driving to school, I felt a little depressed and anxious. Everything in the past few weeks left me feeling overwhelmed. I wanted to just cry. I knew the tears would bring a sense of relief. But my eyes were dry, and I was left with a dull anxiety.
As I was driving, I glanced to the side of the road, and four deer stood watching the road from the grassy expanse that shrouded the blacktop. Don't ask me why, but it was such a relief to see them- as if God were sending me a sign that things were okay and would get better. The deer looked so tall and regal. They were absolutely beautiful with lustrous sandy brown coats and white throats. Their heads darted back and forth as they watched each car zoom by.
I cried, then I laughed. And I felt better. This is a rough patch, but the days will get better.
Monday, 10:58 p.m., Oct. 29
The immigration law and Oklahoma's outlaw origins
A measure recently passed into Oklahoma law now targets illegal immigrants by making it a felony to transport or shelter illegal immigrants. In November, the law will cut off welfare and financial aid to illegal immigrants. Our state even caught USA Today's attention for passing one of the "toughest" and "most restrictive" policies against illegal immigrants.
State Rep. Randy Terrill, author of the measure, said the law will ensure that Oklahoma does not become a haven for illegal immigrants.
Damn those outlaws, polluting the virtuosity of this great state.
Oh, but wait, our state was founded by thiefs who took back the Indian reservations under the guise of "progress," allocated the land to white men who then illegally settled, or stole, plots of land before the designated land run. If that were not insult enough to Oklahoma's Native American tribes, our university goes so far as to exalt these outlaws, the Sooners, by allowing them to hold the coveted position as our school mascot.
But Terrill would have you believe those illegal immigrants are blemishes on Oklahoma's snow white history, and they are the real thieves, taking jobs at unliveable wages and taking advantage of public subsidies.
But he's the expert. He said so in Wednesday's The Oklahoman.
Monday, 3:25 p.m., Oct. 22
Planet Earth, Oklahoma and Global Warming
If you can read through the 14 pages of text, New York Times magazine writer Jon Gert gives a sobering portrayal of the global warming problem: a diminished freshwater supply. And I thought the potential flooding of major coastal cities was bad.
I wrote a story about this subject last summer delving into the repercussions a 3 degree temperature change could have on Oklahoma's delicate ecosystem. It's not pretty. This projected rise in temperature would trigger fluctuations in precipitation with severe droughts one year and floods the next. Sound familiar?
This list continues with higher temperatures driving up the number of imported red ants who feel at home with hot days reminiscent to their place of origin, Brazil, and drier conditions for farmers resulting in a competition for water. The abundance of fire ants and the competition for water are major issues in southern Oklahoma. Trust me, I know. My front yard in Milburn looks like a land mine where ants have collapsed holes into the ground with their hideous "gopher" mounds. And "Save Our Water" signs litter the sides of the road through Tishomingo and Mill Creek, protesting sales of local water to Oklahoma City or outside states. Eufaula even has a website devoted to the topic.
I know there are politicians who say global warming does not exist, or that natural elements like cow manure or volcanoes are causing the deterioration of the ozone layer. But scientists agree that humans are a major culprit in releasing carbon emissions into the environment, and global warming is a very real issue.
It's easy to take the passive approach and ignore the reality our environment faces. But the ozone layer is diminishing whether we acknowledge global warming or not. I don't know about you, but I think we need to make some serious changes to public policy regarding clean air and recycling- if not out of selfishness for our children's future well-being, than out of gratitude for the beauty our planet has so generously given us.
Tuesday, 11:08 p.m., Oct. 16
The beauty of existence
I could write about how the Oklahoma City Council passed a bill to prohibit tattooing fish when it should be spending time on more pressing matters, such as teachers' salaries or school funding, or I could condemn the California dentist that defends breast rubs as a necessary form of treatment, but I won't.
Instead I'm going to push the chaos of the outside world away for a few minutes and immerse myself in Keyshia Coles' "Let It Go," a completely indulgent song about a lousy man. Nothing earth-shattering, but, damn, it feels good.
When I first bought her CD and listened to the first track, Cole's voice belted out of my speakers,"You need to get- if he don't wanna/Love you the right way- he ain't gonna" and I was taken back to the days when I lived in the cockroach infested house on the hill with my mother- where life was beautiful as long as I could play Mariah Carey's "My All" on full-blast.
Even though I'm deaf, something about the music speaks to my soul, and I truly believe as long as the song is playing then the world is okay. The melodic strains consume me, coalescing with my every muscle, fiber, cell, atom- my very being.
Too often with this blog, I feel, with the continuous criticism of public policy and similar issues, that I'm channeling CNN's Nancy Grace, a nasty woman who I find absolutely repugnant. How can anyone truly appreciate life if they're always spouting out negativity?
I understand the need for intelligent discourse about festering problems in our society. That's why I think blogs are a brilliant opportunity of public forum. But I think losing oneself in this constant berating can diminish the overarching message of existence: Life is hard and sometimes depressing, but beauty lurks in small moments so potent and palpable it makes the day worth living.
So take out the CD you love, smell the soft fragrance of outside foliage and watch your episode of Heroes. The world is a beautiful place, and everyone deserves a respite.
Wednesday, 4:00 p.m., Oct. 10
Behind the story
A story I wrote about my mother's mental illness was published today. So far the feedback has been good. I'm hoping a bad apple won't come around, but with sensitive issues, it's almost inevitable.
The journey to write this story has been an emotionally and physically draining ride for the past three weeks. Visiting my childhood is not something I do often because most of the memories are too painful. In fact, I have blocked out huge chunks of my life from my memory. Sometimes my sisters Starlet and Christina will relate a story from our past with Mom, and it will shock me that I have no recollection of what they're talking about. Sometimes when you block out the bad, it takes the good with it.
I decided to clean the cobwebs of my closet and figure out who my mother really is: a human being I love dealing with a serious illness.
I wanted to shed light on how a mental illness not only affects the person suffering from the disorder, but how it affects the entire family in ways that are hard to conceptualize. After a weekend of my mother's episodes, whether they are violent or just more erratic than usual, leaves me so depressed I don't want to go to school when Monday arrives. I don't want to do anything. I just want to sink in a hole and cease to exist for awhile. But you have to go on.
Yesterday, I felt jittery and nervous all day. Around noon, breathing became difficult, and small panic attacks seized me. I was scared to death that when the story reached print, people wouldn't care, and putting my life out there for everyone to judge would have been in vain. I even considered withdrawing entirely. But this story has to be told, and from the messages I've received today, I'm not the only one dealing with this issue.
Mental illness affects everyone in one capacity or another. That's why it's imperative that we make changes to a system that is not working. Too many people are at stake.
Since I began this story, my mother's condition has deteriorated severely in the past weeks. She has assaulted a woman at the dorms where my sister goes to school, been to the hospital for letting her brother-in-law, who is as ignorant as her husband, scratch a dry contact out of her eye and has had frequent spells of crying, despondency and self-righteous anger.
And she should be angry. She is a human being with a sickness, no different than someone with diabetes except her ailment affects her mind, yet many people treat her like a dog. How much indignity can a person endure?
Apparently a lot in Oklahoma.
Tuesday, 8:10 p.m., Oct. 9
Minimum wage at OU?
I watched an old PBS Now episode, "The Living Wage," in my Honors Culture class, and it brought up an issue that I've touched before that worries me: minimum wage that doesn't cover the cost of living.
And it's closer to home, or school, than you'd think. The episode chronicled the efforts of a group of college activists at Vanderbilt University who joined with the campus's lowest paid workers to fight for livable wages for the unsung heroes who keep the gears of the university running smoothly, such as the groundskeepers, the cooks, the dining service workers and janitors.
One of the people interviewed, DeWayne Arbogast, worked as a custodian for the university at $8.45 an hour. After devoting 14 years to the job, Arbogast had only received a $3 raise.
Karen Jones worked a part-time job cooking and cleaning at a daycare in addition to her minimum wage full-time job at Vanderbilt University. She worked fourteen hour days, from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., five days a week to make ends meet.
Harvard students protested low wages in a similar situation a few years before.
These stories made me wonder what the situation is for our lowest paid workers at OU. How much do they get paid? Do they get insurance? What benefits do they get?
It is easy to get lost in the mentality that our university is a haven of sorts. The students are sheltered, or oblivious, to the grunt work that goes into making our campus such a place of comfort and beauty.
We should take a cue from the students at Vanderbilt and meet the workers face to face to gauge if there is a problem or not. If there isn't a problem, then we can be proud of our university for setting the standard. However, if our groundskeepers, custodians and dining service workers are receiving unlivable wages, we should group together and help them.
Regardless of the job, the pay for a week's work should be enough to live on. We should not allow the people who share a common loyalty to the campus to continue living a substandard lifestyle, be it Vanderbilt University, Harvard or OU.
Monday, 7:04 p.m., Oct. 1
Wal-Mart continued
I relented and went to Wal-Mart yesterday, a full two hours after I wrote my blog.
I tried to explain to my fiancé Christopher that I couldn’t shop at the superchain because Wal-Mart pays its workers unlivable wages and engages in underhanded business practices, such as erasing overtime hours worked and firing employees who qualified for health insurance after they worked 40 hour weeks.
“God, if it’s not the chicken beaks, it’s Wal-Mart! Why can’t we just get a roll of toilet paper without you boycotting everything?” Chris said.
I didn’t feel like another idealistic tirade was appropriate, so- without argument- we went to “Wally-World” as my Granny majestically refers to the place.
In the previous blog, I concluded that Wal-Mart employees continue to work for low wages because the corporation socializes them into believing they are valued members in an important team in which everyone is held at the same standards and levels.
After seeing the disgruntled faces in the Women’s section, the frantic pace in Electronics and the surly, fatigued expressions of cashiers, I’ve come to realize a large number of Wal-Mart employees are not sucked into the company's “team” rhetoric. Quite the contrary, these people seem to hate their jobs.
But that still presents a daunting question: why do people continue to work at places like Wal-Mart for such miserly wages?
Barbara Ehrenreich suggested that the depersonalizing and degrading atmosphere of these jobs cause employees to believe the low wages they’re paid are the true value of their work.
I agree. After pee tests, insulting personality tests, condescending managers and accusations of “time theft,” workers may doubt their own trustworthiness and feel lucky to have the job at all, even if it works them to the bone for next-to-nothing wages.
Sunday, 10:47 a.m., Sept. 30
Wal-Mart shortcuts its employees
After watching Frontline’s Nov. 16, 2004 episode, “Is Wal-Mart Good for America?” and reading Barbara Ehrenreich’s experiences as a Wal-Mart “assistant” in her book, Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, I’m feeling a conflicting resentment for the super chain.
As a child, Wal-Mart’s $7 hourly pay seemed like a goldmine, compared to my mother’s $5.45 minimum wage at McDonald’s. Fast forward 10 years, many fast food restaurants, like several Burger King and McDonald’s sites, offer $10 an hour whereas Wal-Mart’s pay remains a stagnant $7 an hour.
Lawrence Michel at the Economic Policy Institute, although optimistic about the rise in minimum wage over the past ten years, admitted that productivity, which is tied in theory to wages, “has been rising at such a healthy clip that ‘workers should be getting much more,’” according to Ehrenreich’s book. We've reached a point where hard work is not enough to lift a person from poverty. When a person works low-wage jobs with corporate owners, they've checked their respect and rights at the door. In such an atmosphere where workers are faceless commodities, hard workers are exploited.
Ehrenreich said a co-worker at Wal-Mart once warned her not to reveal her full abilities to management because “the more they think you can do, the more they’ll use you and abuse you.”
Wal-Mart management is so preoccupied with extracting every second of labor from their employees, that “time theft,” such as sneaking a minute to go to the bathroom or chatting with an employee, is written up as a demerit.
Wal-Mart employees leave a day’s work mentally and physically exhausted, with only two 15 minute breaks during the day to provide respite and time off their feet.
Wal-Mart admits its employees are essential to its success with its very slogan, “At Wal-Mart, our people make the difference.” Yet they reward their employees with inadequate pay, so low that the 1988 Arkansas state senator Jay Bradford attacked the corporation for paying its employees so little that several had to turn to the state for welfare.
In recent times, the inadequate pay of corporations like Wal-Mart make life for the impoverished worker even more difficult as the cost of housing, be it apartments or rentals, continues to escalate at unaffordable proportions. Ehrenreich lamented, “…If rents are exquisitely sensitive to market forces, wages clearly are not.”
The kind of lifestyle that Wal-Mart provides its workers through its low wages is mere existence. To add insult to injury, Wal-Mart, with its billions of dollars in profits, is one of the primary companies who could afford to provide its workers with health care and pay overtime. But more often than not, they don't.
Stories abound of Wal-Mart employees who are forced to work 38 and a half hours a week so Wal-Mart doesn’t have to fork out insurance for employees working 40-hour weeks. Employees who work 40 hours or more or warned to scale back or risk demerits or getting fired.
In West Virginia, New Mexico, Oregon and Colorado, employees sued the Wal-Mart chain, according to a Jan. 24, 1999 article in the Charleston Gazette. The plaintiffs alleged they were pressured to work overtime and that Wal-Mart erased the overtime hours from their time records. Two former Wal-Mart managers said they had altered time records to conceal overtime work.
So why don’t Wal-Mart employees revolt and demand livable wages, better treatment and health insurance? Quite frankly, employees are defenseless against the efficient, well-oiled machine of Wal-Mart.
In orientation employees are taught of the evils and detriments that unions perpetuate. Beware, unions will only manipulate and hurt you- even more than we do!
Employees are also encouraged to believe they are part of a family that “cares” and that everyone in the Wal-Mart business circle is equal to one another. During business trips, even top Wal-Mart CEOs stay in the same cheap hotel rooms as managers and associates, two people to room, to perpetuate this idea that everyone within the Wal-Mart infrastructure is on the same level.
Employees feel they belong to a team with a profit sharing program in which Wal-Mart’s stock price is posted daily in the break-room and through regular meetings that resemble pep rally’s as employees announce the highest-selling items and collectively perform the “Wal-Mart” cheer: “Give me a W!” to which the employees enthusiastically respond, “W!” continuing with each letter in the Wal-Mart name. At the hyphen, “Gimme a squiggly!” is shouted while a leader “squats and twists his hips at the same time” to which the workers “squiggle right back,” Ehrenreich said. Wal-Mart expert Bob Ortega said Sam Walton got the idea for the cheer on a 1975 trip to Japan when he saw factory workers performing “group calisthenics and company cheers.”
In a disgusting twist, Wal-Mart manipulates its workers’ very human need for community and a sense of belonging by creating an environment where workers are led to believe they are important team members. In reality, they are a mistreated group of people exploited as cheap labor. Because of this idea of “teamwork,” those devoted to Wal-Mart may be less inclined to pursue other stores offering similar work for higher pay. Some employees may think, “Well, Wal-Mart cares about me,” unaware that Target, for instance, offers its employees higher pay and health insurance.
It’s really a shame that a company as wealthy as Wal-Mart treats its employees in such a shabby manner and seems to exert so much energy on not paying its employees a livable wage. With all the rhetoric on serving the desires of the customer, would Wal-Mart listen if a large portion of its customer base complained about Wal-Mart employees’ low pay and lack of benefits? Take that a step further. What if the customers refused to shop at Wal-Mart until their workers received livable wages and health insurance? Would the company that dictates the cost of items and has bankrupted quality merchandisers, like Rubbermaid, appease the wishes of its customers? I think they would if it came to financial necessity.
Wal-Mart workers have no union. We, the customers, may be the only voice they have.
Tuesday, 8:12 p.m., Sept. 25
Beakless chickens, and other alarming food facts
My friends are laughing at me, but I’m dead serious. I won’t eat chicken and a lot of other things since watching John Robbins’s (of the Baskin-Robbins ice cream empire) 1987 classic, “Diet for a New America.”
The movie showed chickens packed tightly together in small crates. Acting from a natural inclination to defend their space, the chickens would peck the other chickens to death. As a result farmers began to clip the chickens beaks off. Watching a chicken writhing in pain as a man cuts its beak off to a flat edge, I made a vow to not eat chicken. I cannot let my contribution to society be the consumption of creatures that are treated with such cruelty.
The movie also explored the pervasive myths that we are spoon-fed as children in elementary school. We’re supposed to eat two to three dairy products a day to build up healthy, strong bones, right?
Nope, the high fat levels and concentrated proteins found in many dairy products can increase a person’s osteoporosis level by depleting calcium from the bones.
The food pyramid that teachers have ingrained in our brains since Kindergarten are pure advertisements. No nutritionist or dietician ever developed the food pyramid. Instead, the respective associations of each food group determined through their individual “research” how many servings of their food we should consume, according to Robbins and as hinted by last week’s guest speaker Marion Nestle, author and professor of nutrition, food studies and public health. These food associations have an invested interest in influencing people’s perceptions of what is healthy and not.
Such a revelation, though surprising, makes a great deal of sense. I have often wondered, “How the heck am I supposed to eat 11 servings of bread and grains, 3 servings of vegetables, 2 servings of fruit, 2-3 servings of dairy and 2-3 servings of meat every day? I’m not that hungry!”
Another interesting tidbit: Twelve pounds of grain only makes one pound of ground beef. In contrast, 12 pounds of grain could make 53 pounds of cereal or 12 loaves of bread. Eighty percent of produce raised, such as grains, is fed to animals- not humans. How can we excuse this waste when there are countries in the world suffering from dire rates of starvation every single year? Is this a responsible use of our resources? We could feed more people and save mountains of animal feces (and the illnesses caused when these feces drain into groundwater) by eating vegetables and fruit.
Even as I say this though, I acknowledge, as a girl who grew up on my Papa’s angus farm, that cutting out meat would be hard to adjust to (that, and I don’t know how to cook tofu.) But, ethically, if we can feed all of the world’s starving people, we should.
If you cut meat from your diet, you’re not deprived. Nutritionists agree that vegetable proteins are superior to animal proteins.
As a way to bend the rules, I tried to make an exception for animals who feed on grass rather than grain.
Then I started to think about an animal’s capacity to feel and the attachments they form with one other, attachments that I do not respect when I eat meat.
This very discussion has led to my new nickname in The Daily office, “Lettuce Killer.”
I’m killing cows, or I’m killing lettuce. It’s a dilemma.
Sunday, 7:30 p.m., September 23
Health insurance denies those who can't pay
Health insurance is in the news but for all the wrong reasons.
In a September 22 article, the New York Times announced that the federal government has dropped a bomb on New York health officials, stating that chemotherapy does not qualify for coverage under the government-financed program for emergency medical care. Before the announcement, illegal immigrants could have chemotherapy sessions paid for by emergency medical care.
I wonder what really motivated this change of heart: did government officials truly believe that chemotherapy, and the inevitable death that would result from its absence, does not truly fall under an “emergency,” or that illegal immigrants were receiving medical care amidst a fierce national debate of the immigration issue?
Critics say this is one more of the Bush administration’s efforts to deny the uninsured from public health services. If the health insurance lobbyists were applying pressure, the theory is plausible. For the past year, health insurance companies and health care providers have undergone a firestorm of criticism. People are dying in waiting rooms waiting for care, but it matters not, unless you have the money to pay. It’s as if our country is telling the nation’s poor, “Too bad your minimum wage job doesn’t provide insurance. If you get sick and die, it’s your own fault because you can’t afford health insurance.”
An ironic twist to the federal government’s decision on chemotherapy: After years of lobbying, advocates for breast cancer patients were able to pressure the federal government to implement free or low-cost breast cancer screening to uninsured women provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It’s a spit in the face of those who are uninsured and suffering from cancer. You can get diagnosed for cancer, but if you don’t have the money, you’re not going to get the treatment.
People are getting fed up with the current disorganization and high costs of health insurance. The problem has reached such proportions, democratic presidential candidate, Hilary Clinton, is using a reformed single-payer health insurance program as one of her platforms, the same program her husband promoted during his presidency with little success. But these are changing times. Even die-hard conservatives are scratching their heads over the health insurance problem and thinking, uhhh, this is a problem. For years, my Aunt Anita spoke vehemently against those who supported universal health care, saying such people were driven by a “selfish, take-care-of-me” attitude. Last week, I spoke to her about the issue, and she said of the current state of health care, shaking her head, “God, what a mess!”
Even the revered Lords of Sports have dealt with the mighty slap of privatized health care. The NFL Union spoke to Congress, asking for greater authority to approve disability claims. Former Dallas Cowboys star Daryl Johnston summed up the problem with this particularly powerful quote, “We have no voice and we have no bargaining power. The money is there to fix the problem.” This is quite a contradiction to the Olympian standards of ancient Greece, where Olympic athletes were treated with a lifetime of care, housing and food. The current state has reached such an abysmal state that the older players who built the league into what it is today are reduced to beggars denied the respect they deserve for the remainder of their lives. They beat their bodies and exposed themselves to injuries to entertain us, the American people. Yet, even sport legends are not immune to denial of health care.
Tuesday, 5:13 p.m., Sept. 18
Is Fox News biased?
My uncle asked me yesterday where I like to get my news.
I shrugged and said, “I read the New York Times online and I listen to CNN on my satellite radio—“
“Whoa, whoa,” he said, waving his arms in a dramatic gesture. “CNN is the most biased thing you can watch on TV.”
“It is?”
“They always make the story how they want it to be. They don’t give you the truth. It’s just one side- that’s all your getting. They’re always doing reports against the war— they’re as bad as ABC News or CBS News. And they’re always putting down the President. You want to know where you can watch honest news that doesn’t twist the facts, where they give you news with no bias?”
“MSNBC?” I guessed. He dropped his shoulders in exasperation.
"No. Fox News.” Deadpan.
I burst out laughing. Surely, my uncle was joking. Even conservatives acknowledge that Fox News is a place to receive staunchly Republican news from a conservative perspective.
My cousins grew so disgusted with the channel’s one-sided reporting, they blocked the channel from their cable receiver.
“What a crock of crap,” I said. “Fox News is the most biased set of propaganda I’ve ever seen.”
Again, deadpan. “I am serious,” my uncle said. “You watch those other news channels and then you watch Fox News, and you will see that Fox News gives you the whole story without any bias what-so-ever.”
I couldn’t believe this was a real conversation. How could my uncle be so naïve? Maybe I’m the one that is naïve. I haven’t watched Fox News in years— maybe it’s changed. It got me thinking, is there such a thing as fair and balanced reporting in broadcast today?
I think if viewers reviewed most news stories, they would find that bias is not as prevalent as believed. Bias is often perception. If a story doesn’t jive with the way the viewer wants the world to be, then they think the story is “biased.” For instance with my uncle, any news story that portrays the war or President George Bush negatively is "biased," which basically means that Fox News is the only remaining "unbiased" station, reporting information in a way that reinforces my uncles own ideology of the world.
News organizations, acting out of fairness, feel obliged to report these political claims of bias, and in a twist or irony, their sense of fairness is their detriment. By reporting these bias claims, news organizations perpetuate distrust among the public in the fairness of news.
The real bias in broadcast, however, comes through loud and clear as political commentators on cable channels spout their opinions cloaked as “political analysis.”
There is the argument that journalists display bias in the very stories they choose to write about, and, to an extent, that is true. But contrary to the general perception that journalists infiltrate each story with a predisposed agenda, many journalists make a conscientious effort to avoid bias in their stories. Except for Fox News. They really blow my mind
Maybe I'm wrong. They report. You decide.
Monday, 9:16 p.m., Sept. 17
A lawsuit over a flat iron
During lunch today, I was chowing down on my Taco Mayo burrito in Crossroads Lounge when Judge Alex came on the television.
The case of the day: a woman was suing her friend for losing her flat iron and for mental anguish caused by the loss of the flat iron in the total sum of $250. The plaintiff lended her $150 flat iron to her friend, the defendant, who was going to jail. The defendant had refused to pay for the flat iron because a “drug addict stole it.” Have you stifled a giggle yet?
Normally, I turn a deaf ear (and not figuratively) to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce yakking about lawsuit abuse in our country (although they focus primarily on lawsuits directed towards businesses rather than individuals), but they may be right when it comes to frivolous, and downright absurd, cases like this one.
What idiot do you have to be to send your convicted friend off to jail with your prized, expensive flat iron? I’ve worked at a prison before as a detention officer, and I can tell you there's no beauty pageant potential. One, a flat iron is considered a potential weapon and is generally not allowed in the cells. Two, who the heck is the convicted friend going to impress with her straight hair? The men are incarcerated in a separate section of the jail and are not allowed to be within visual contact of female inmates. Three, the female inmates look rough (no make-up, no hair-dryer and an orange jumpsuit complete the look), so someone with perfectly coifed hair sticks out like a sore thumb.
As for the plaintiff’s mental anguish, she could buy seven brand-new flat irons for the price she spent on one to curtail the “emotional distress” her curly locks caused to her self-esteem. I've got curly hair and my Conair does wonders.
Yes, this case is a joke, Judge Alex is a joke, but I have to admit it was amusing. And it beat watching soaps playing on the other TV.
4:20 p.m., Wednesday, Sept. 12
Few drawbacks to universal health care
In response to Jesse Podroza’s request for information on the drawbacks of Universal Health Care, here is some information I found:
Although in countries with a single-payer system of health care everyone has access to basic levels of care, but there are quotas and planned waiting times.
The standard care plan is developed by government physicians and officials who decide what provisions will be covered and how certain conditions will be treated, according to a June 30 article on CNN.com.
Health care analyst Paul Keckley said as many as 15 to 20 percent of the population in these countries buys medical services outside the government-run health care system through supplemental insurance or by purchasing services out of pocket. The people who pay more for their health care tend to be in the upper income level or have complicated conditions, according to the article.
So in brief, the problems include long waiting lines, and special conditions may not be covered under universal health care.
But when you consider that the United States is ranked 37 for it’s health care system by the World Health Organization, a far cry from smaller nations like France and Canada who occupy the top 10 list, the few faults mentioned above seem trivial when compared to the nightmare of the United States private health care system.
When cancer patients are dying because they can’t afford insurance, I think that should indicate to us that they system needs to be reorganized.
One of my aunts suspects she has the cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2, which could up her likelihood of getting cancer by 85 percent. But there's no way she’s getting tested for the gene. Her doctor pretty much guaranteed if her tests came back positive for the gene, her insurance would, inevitably, drop her or charge her exorbitant premiums.
Now isn’t that the ultimate irony? The person who would need the insurance the most, someone with a high likelihood of developing cancer in his/her lifetime, is the person private health insurance would dismiss as too risky.
From the information I have gathered, I am more inclined to lean towards a single-payer health care system for the United States, but I do want both sides. I have yet to find information with a balanced representation of the pros and cons of both private health insurance and universal health care. If you find a source of information that discusses the topic without bias, let me know. I want to read it.
10:45 p.m., Monday, Sept. 10
Farmers are the unsung heroes
Have you ever had a day when it seems fate is set upon doing you in?
Last Saturday was one of those days. Although angry clouds furled in the sky, the stagnant air hung around me like a cloying blanket, hot and stuffy without a single breeze for relief. I was sweating profusely beneath gray clouds, dragging dead tree branches away from the old pecan trees on my Papa’s land.
Over the past year, my Papa’s pasture had grown to Amazon proportions and because he needed the sale of the pecans to make the payment on the land, we were moving heavy boughs from around the tree trunks so my fiance could brush-hog beneath the trees. (For those unfamiliar with brush-hogging, it is the equivalent to mowing, except it is a piece of machinery attached to a tractor to mow large expanses of land, like pasture.)
As the hours passed from noon to evening, my arms ached from moving limbs and burned from scratching myself on burrs and thorny grapevines that threatened to consume the trees. But as my resolve waned with the darkening skies, my Papa, perpetually the workaholic, kept insisting, “Just one more. Just this one more tree.”
Soon, the clouds hovering above with an ominous threat burst as if heaven’s flood gates had exploded. Torrents of rain poured down upon us, its silvery fingers lashing our faces and clothes, obscuring our vision, but still Papa insisted upon moving the dead limbs and brush-hogging. “Just one more tree. We can get this last tree.”
Then a loud crack split through the air. I turned and a thick limb the size of a mature tree fell to the ground where I had stood just minutes before. I stepped back unnerved. Only an hour ago, I had been thinking about a teenage couple who had posed beneath an old tree for their senior pictures, when the tree dilapidated on top of them. The boy had died.
My fiance, Chris, perched on the tractor, waved for me to get away from the tree.
“There’s no telling what this old tree will do!” Chris yelled in the escalating pace of the storm, the lightening slicing through the sky as peals of thunder echoed overhead. “We need to get out from under here!” He looked at my Papa and said, “John, I think it’s time we call it a night!” And my Papa finally relented.
I hopped onto the tractor with Chris, the machine’s canopy providing no cover in the lashing rain. My Papa hopped in his truck, and we hightailed it out of there.
As the rain slapped our faces, Chris yelled over the roar of the tractor and the rain how relieved he was I had escaped the falling tree branch unscathed. “That could have killed you!“ he yelled, his face somber.
Chris drove the tractor around a thick, silver guiding cord connected to a tall electric tower, hoping his change in direction would guide my grandfather.
He glanced back, and his face went pale. “Your Papa is going to hit that power cord!”
I craned to look behind me, and my papa’s white pick-up truck was headed straight for the cord. Chris and I screamed, waving our arms, “Papa…Papa…Papa…Papa!” But he was oblivious, the cacophony of his truck engine, the pouring rain and our tractor drowning out the screams. The rain fell like slanted glass, blinding in the headlights. The cord faded into the rain’s jagged angles.
My heart thudded in my chest, and fear enveloped me, with one word emblazoned before my eyes, “Noooooooooooooooooooo” but the only word I could croak, yell, scream, plead over and over was, “Papa! Papa! Papa! Papa!”
But it was too late.
His truck grazed the side of the cord, giving my heart a squelching hope, then his side-mirror popped off with the sound of a bullet. Papa figuring out his mistake, sped up, but the cord caught on his truck’s cab. The head of the electric tower snapped and electric cords viciously ripped in two, striking the air with luminescent currents like writhing snakes.
My heart stopped. Time stopped. My body went numb. The tears made my lips taste salty. Shocked, stunned, in grief, I could only scream a monotonous chant, “Papa, Papa, Papa, Papa, Papa.”
But the cord, hung on my papa’s cab, secured the head as it bobbed in the wind beside the tower. If my grandfather moved any farther, the cab would snap the cord, and the looming plank, with electric currents sizzling from its head, would land on my papa’s truck. Only years before, my uncle, my papa’s brother, had been electrocuted to death, the volts from an electric tower so powerful they exploded his truck.
Chris wrapped his arm around my waist, and yelled, “Don’t you dare! Goddamit, don‘t you dare!“ How could he know the rushed thoughts and calculations running through my mind: how could I jump off the tractor, avert the brush-hog and run to my Papa’s truck, rapt his window and stop him? “Stay where you are!“ Chris yelled.
And as if by saving grace, my grandfather slammed the truck in brake and emerged from the front seat.
I didn’t even feel relief. I was still in shock. I thought my Papa was going to die, and it wracked my soul with numb fear. I just couldn’t trust that things were okay yet.
No hugs were exchanged. We just stood in the rain, terrified and in disbelief.
After some perusing online, I discovered that farming was listed as the six most dangerous job in America by the Bureau of Labor Statistics with 41.1 farmers and ranchers dying per 100,000.
The potential to get harmed on a farm reaches astronomical heights when dangerous machinery, unpredictable animals, falling trees and uncontrollable weather are added to the equation. Yet for their sacrifices, farmers seem to have been discarded in our political environment for large corporations. It is not uncommon to hear of farmers in southern Oklahoma having raised chickens or hogs for national food chains, only to get paid embarrassing, meager sums for hard work that is often stinky and tiring.
Farmers really are the unsung heroes of our country. While the cost for producing crops climbs and the economic plight of agriculture fluctuates to dangerous levels, these men and women put their lives on the line, slaving in the heat, rain and cold (which, in Oklahoma, can happen all in one day) to provide the public with amenities, such as food and textiles. In addition, they do jobs that allow the public to live in comfort, knowing food is as close as the next grocery store.
In other thoughts…
I wanted to apologize to DL and any of the other readers I disappointed in my last blog. DL is exactly right. September 6 blog was just a rehash of other articles and actually did what I complained about in my Journalism Ethics class: blogging that is merely a regurgitation of facts. I will try to not make this mistake again, and I encourage all of you guys to critique me and point out the faults in my writing. I’m a student after all. I want to learn from my mistakes and serve you, the readers, better.
I also wanted to applaud Dawn Pamplin’s efforts to rescue mistreated pit bulls and find them loving owners through the Oklahoma Bully Breed Rescue program. As the owner of five dogs, including two beautiful pit bull terriers, I can contend that these dogs are very sweet and loving. I truly think that socialization is the culprit of the breed’s infamous stereotype. Many of the people who get pit bulls do so because they want a vicious, aggressive animal, and they ensure these animals behave according to this standard in the way they treat their animals. Chris and I have had She-ra and Cronus for four years. We shower them with love and affection, and that is how they tend to respond to others, even strangers. We often joke that they would make the worst guard dogs because as soon as a person comes up to our door they roll over, eager for a belly rub.
5:45 p.m., Thursday, Sept. 6
5 important issues this week
The following are five important issues for thought:
1. Immigration raids will continue undeterred during the 2010 Census count despite the Census Bureau’s request for a suspension of raids during the population count, said Pat Reilly, Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokeswoman. How can we accurately gauge the impact of the Hispanic population in the United States when the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is amplifying distrust among a group already suspicious of government workers?
2. As you may have noticed on the back of section A of The Oklahoma Daily’s Wednesday paper, State Treasurer Scott Meacham took out a full page spread to explain the detriments of coal pollution. The OG&E company is seeking pre-approval from the Oklahoma Corporation Commission to build a new generating unit at the company's existing Sooner Power Plant near Red Rock. Touted as state-of-the-art coal fired power plant, the cost would be approximately $1.8 billion. OG$E has proposed rate changes to recoup the costs of construction over five-years. Why would our state invest billions of dollars in carbon emitting technology when investments in natural gas or biodiesals would be cheaper and reduce carbon emissions?
3. The Iraqi police force’s nauseating corruption is a problem with Shiite militia and other corrupt officers having slipped through the screening process, according to reports by the New York Times. As a remaking of the current Iraqi police force is in the works, a report by an independent commission created by Congress indicates that Iraq’s army and police will not be able to take charge of the country’s security independently for at least 12 to 18 months, which hinders efforts to get large numbers of troops back to the states…
4. Speaking of which, the Senate Democratic leaders are “showing a new openness to compromise” by stepping back from a withdrawal deadline in attempt to attract Republican votes needed to force at least modest troop withdrawals in the coming months, according to a September 5 New York Times article. Is is worth it for U.S. troops to stay for another year to a year and a half to stabilize Iraqi security, or will insurgency and an absence of a large middle class necessary for democracy prove our efforts futile?
5. As mortgage lenders are feeling the financial pinch of risky borrowers, a domino effect has occurred with fewer loans issued, fewer houses sold, an increasing mortgage crisis with foreclosure rates that parallel those from the Great Depression. The question is obvious: how do we improve mortgage and economic conditions and save home owners from foreclosure in an environment where people regularly spend and borrow more than they actually have?
Tiara Etheridge is a journalism senior.
11:35 a.m., Monday, Sept. 3
The story of a stranger
My fiancé and I were driving home last night, our bellies full with steak and potatoes, when we passed a man walking down the dirt road holding a small girl who clung to his neck protectively.
Even beneath the moon’s distorting glow, the man’s bloodshot eyes and his gapped teeth, brown with decay, were visible. With one arm carrying the young girl and the other hand clutching a diaper and a plastic box of wet wipes, the man walked with intent, purpose, possibly anger — his brisk pace causing the child’s brown curls to bounce in the still, humid air.
I saw this girl and I wondered, what is her story? What pain and horrors have those innocent eyes seen? It’s an unsettling thought that surfaces every time I see a child seemingly entrenched in poverty.
A disturbing picture from my childhood threatened to envelop me. I commanded my brain to resist, but the memories always win. The pain gripped my heart with fiery claws, and I could feel myself slipping into a reverie from the past.
I was ten years old. My sister was seven.
When she slept, her long, black lashes fluttered and her eyebrows would flinch painfully. Maybe she was hungry. I was too. With our bellies empty and the food stamps run out for the month, it was hard to sleep.
As the cockroaches scurried up the wood paneling of our bedroom, I would glance back at my sister. She looked like an angel, her soft, cherubic face shrouded with brown ringlets. If I noticed a baby cockroach crawling on her face or her neck, I’d brush it away, dread eating away at my stomach. If she woke up and saw the bugs crawling on her, she’d cry. She hated the cockroaches- they scared her.
And at night, the slugs came out and roamed the hall leading to the bathroom. Despite how badly I had to pee, I would hold it until the first rays of dawn peaked through our window because the slippery sensation of a slug beneath my foot scared me more than death.
And as quickly as it came, the memory receded.
Sorrow gripped my soul like a choking vise. I wanted to travel through the grips of time and hug these two girls and whisper in their ears, “You will get through this. You will find a way.”
I felt a twitch behind my eyes, threatening tears, and a weight in my chest. I wanted to cry for those two girls hiding in the bedroom, for the girl on the dirt road and for any other child who has had to deal with hungry nights, palpable fear in the middle of the night and the constant burden of poverty.
I made a prayer that God would shield her from the darkness and cruelty the world can exude in overwhelming abundance, hoping my request didn’t fall upon deaf ears.
I wanted the girl in the dirt road to have a happy ending. I wanted to tell her, despite what’s she’s seen or felt, “You will get through this. You will find a way.” But she is another stranger with another story as enigmatic as life itself.
I tapped my fiancé and asked him to give the man and child a ride, but the man turned toward a weed-strewn driveway. Further up from the driveway, a trailer-house sat on a slant, its exterior stained tan from age. The lawn was a forest with tall grasses concealing any number of native predators and insects crawling on the belly of Oklahoma earth.
The little girl turned her head back and looked at our Honda. And although I knew she couldn’t see through the window's tinting, especially at night, I waved. And I wondered again, with a note of sadness, “What is her story?”
Tiara Etheridge is a journalism senior.
5:42 p.m., Saturday, Sept. 1
Cancer Society brings health insurance problem to forefront
The American Cancer Society has announced plans to focus its entire $15 million advertising budget towards highlighting the problems of inadequate health insurance.
Frustrated by a lagging decline in cancer rates and research that shows a lack of health insurance delays the detection of malignancies, the non-profit organization hopes to intensify political focus on the issue, according to a New York Times article.
If a non-profit, non-partison group is willing to direct focus on the health care issue and doctors are now offering patients zero interest loans, I think its rather indicative that the privatization of health insurance is reducing the access to health care in nightmarish proportions.
For instance, a 2003 Emory University Health Sciences Center study revealed one of every 10 cancer patients was uninsured, and those uninsured receive "only about half the health services of insured cancer patients, but pay nearly twice as much in out-of-pocket expenses."
How can we as a country insist equality is a central component of our nation’s ideology when the uninsured cancer victims in our nation put off doctor visits and treatment because, frankly, health care and health insurance are too damn expensive?
By insisting upon the privatization of health care, our politicians are only widening the chasm between the poor and rich. The American poor have higher mortality rates and are more often unhealthy, whereas those who can pay have unlimited access to health care and expensive treatments. Kanye West summed up the social hierarchy in health care well with his song "Roses" in the following lyrics: “You know the best medicine goes to people that's paid/ If Magic Johnson’s got a cure for AIDS.”
This summer, I interviewed the Relay for Life event chairperson, Kelly Murphy-Fryer, and she said something that will always resonate with me. During the last few weeks of her mother’s life before an untimely demise from cancer, Murphy-Fryer's mother was close to capping her insurance at $1 million with the cost of chemotherapy. “A non-profit organization, like the American Cancer Society, is going to have to develop the cure for cancer," Murphy-Fryer said. "There is too much money to be made in prolonging life. There is no incentive for (a private health care organization) to find the cure.”
For a country that boasts the most advanced medical technology in the world, the United States is the only industrialized nation that does not provide health care as a right of citizenship.
And U.S. Census figures released this week indicate the problem isn't leaving anytime soon. The uninsured population in the United States went up, increasing from 15 percent to 15.8 percent, or 47 million people without insurance.
Because of the privatization of the U.S. health care system, the United States spends at least 40 percent more per capita on health care than any other industrialized country that has universal health care.
In a twist of irony, by switching to single-payer universal health care, the United States would actually save $100 billion to $200 billion per year despite covering all the uninsured and increasing health care benefits, according to federal studies by the Congressional Budget Office and the General Accounting office.
Why? Lower administrative costs. The United States spends 50 percent to 100 percent more on administration than single-payer systems.
Wouldn't you think common sense would dictate reforming the current health care system for one that is more cost-efficient? But common sense disintegrates when confronted with the sheer cash flow of the health insurance industry. Health insurance companies are filthy, stinkin’ rich, and they are not about to relinquish their money for the common good. As a result, lobbyists line the velvet pockets of politically influential men, and the privatization of health care continues undeterred.
But we, our generation, can raise this issue in the public conscience. A presidential election is on the horizon. By using the collective voice of our generation, we can make the candidates aware of this important issue and remind them of the following: We the people will vote one of them to office. Our voice should guide their decisions — not that of corporations or lobbyists.
Although universal health care has some faults of its own, an evaluation of this system compared to our own might help guide us toward a health care system that gives our nation's cancer victims a chance to beat this vicious monster through early detection and, on a moral stance, a system that fulfills the American ideal of equality.
Tiara Etheridge is a journalism senior.
3:10 p.m., Wednesday, Aug. 29
CBS exploits kids
“Forty kids. One town. No adults.”
Those words resounding from the television with almost ominous undertones roused me from the listless studying of Sollor’s “Theory of American Ethnicity.”
I watched the commercial for CBS’s new reality show, “Kid Nation,” and felt something akin to disgust stir in my stomach.
Media conglomerates and the folks behind the incessant stream of reality shows really have no shame. It’s no longer enough merely to take advantage of 20-something no-talents starved for fame and attention.
Let’s try the formula on kids, so the teary-eyed boy, scared and stressed from the pressures of creating a community replete with a socioeconomic structure in the New Mexico desert, can be forever endeared as “the wimp from Kid Nation” in television history.
But CBS insists they did not exploit the children and child-labor laws were not violated because the children were not paid for the grueling 12 hour days they worked on set for over a month.
In fact, CBS insisted the children benefited because medical personnel was on call at all times, despite the fact that the network insisted the children and parents sign a waiver agreeing that CBS was not responsible for ensuring medical credentials of those on call and for any harm coming from medical care given to the children, according to a Aug. 24 New York Times article.
Okay, the kids don’t get paid; they work long days under the hot sun; and, if they get harmed during filming, it’s not CBS’s fault.
What the heck were the parents thinking?! CBS should be prosecuted for unlawfully engaging children in labor, and the parents should get their butts spanked for being so careless about the future of these children.
9:32 p.m., Monday, Aug. 27
The person behind the "voice"
Rather than dive straight into commentary, my online editor stressed the need to establish this blog’s direction. During last week’s meeting between HUB bloggers, each blogger discussed the topics that interested him or her the most and how to converge these interests into an identifiable voice. Having entered the meeting the least prepared with a few ideas scratched hastily in my mental notebook, it’s probably no surprise I was unable to delineate my interests in a single, cohesive thread.
But I do have a voice, and that is the beauty of the online community. Our stories are no longer compacted into an all encompassing meta-narrative in which the generalized is held as the standard for history books. Because of blogs, each individual has a unique, personal story to contribute to history. Each individual has a voice again.
So in this pursuit of my “voice,” I felt it necessary to introduce myself, for how can you understand the intended meaning of a voice without knowing the components that contributed and socialized its creation? So here goes...
My name is Tiara Etheridge. I am a 22-year-old female haunted by a childhood marred by extreme poverty and welfare. Living in a small town, I felt the ostracizing sting of gossip and subordination. As a child with a physical handicap (I’m hearing impaired in both ears) and a mentally ill mother (she's schizophrenic), I know what it is to be demeaned and demoralized for another’s self-importance.
Before my handicap was discovered by my first grade teacher, I spent the first two years of my elementary education in Special Education classes. From the confines of the Special Ed building, I watched the “normal” kids play on the swing-sets, monkey bars and slides during recess. With the school day's end, I was ridiculed, taunted and harassed by these students as I waited for my mother's navy Suburban to arrive. I know the pain and humiliation that accompanies the life of the disenfranchised — of the silent. I've lived it.
That is the element I want my blog to represent: the all too often repressed voice of the disenfranchised.
For all the wonderful ideologies our country represents, several problems threaten the basic concept our country is founded upon: equality.
Education
Because of the appropriation of school funds based upon property taxes, we have the most qualified, highly-paid instructors teaching the young wealthy critical components to success with the finest teaching utensils, whereas teachers working at high-poverty schools, who must deal with the stress of low-performing schools, instruct students from aging books in dilapidated buildings- with inadequate pay to add insult to injury. Our education system is reinforcing a social hierarchy that many find difficult to overcome. With many teachers in low-income schools just teaching the basics to succeed in a blue-collar workforce, the idealism of education as a gateway to success goes out the door. It's no wonder why the teacher shortage has reached epidemic numbers.
Mental Illness
On March 31, 2006, the National Alliance on Mental Illness released a report announcing that the United States received a D grade in assisting adults with mental illnesses, with eight states receiving Fs. In Oklahoma, only one public mental health hospital remains, and it’s available beds have taken a nose dive in the past 47 years. As a result, many of our state’s jails and prisons have become de facto mental health facilities. To add to the shame of this matter, as mentally ill people sit in depersonalizing cells that can cause further detriments to their health, a mental health court system would reduce the recidivism rate with half the money spent in incarcerating.
Immigration
This is an issue so polarized and multi-faceted that I will say only this: undocumented workers are human beings fleeing a home plagued with poverty, corruption and destitution. They are human beings striving, albeit illegally, for the very rights of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” that we as U.S. citizens are guaranteed.
Health Care
When people have to call 911 from an emergency room or ambulance and people die because their insurance carriers deny them treatment, it might be an indication that the current health care system needs to be changed- drastically.
My hope is this blog will be a place devoted to airing the "voice" of the voiceless, a community in which all opinions are weighed and compared, and light is centralized upon the key problems that affect those who are disenfranchised.
Tiara Etheridge is a journalism senior.
Comments
Love the blog, honey! But Tish isn't that bad, is it?! Okay, yeah it is.
Jennifer Arterberry - 08/30/07 2:38pm
this is one of the better pieces that i have read. i know it was hard for you when you were younger, but you pulled through and have become a very talented, amazing young woman. i believe your "voice" is something that should be shared with the world. keep up the good work.
anonymouse - 08/30/07 4:28pm
I like Mexicans.
Jesse Podroza - 09/01/07 9:14pm
I love you! Great blog on health care.....but what are the "faults" of universal health care. I'd love to hear because my friend in Switzerland says the healthcare is so much better than here.
Tony - 09/01/07 11:57pm
Tiara, I think you should write a book. Give me an autographed copy.
Star-fighter - 09/04/07 6:47pm
This story really got to me. It made me remember my childhood. People never know what happens behind closed doors. Hopefully, whoever reads this, it will impact them as much as it did me.
Anonymous - 09/06/07 1:42pm
read your "person behind the voice" piece. wow, talk about liberal horsh@&t. there will always be the "haves" and the "have-nots". hard work is the element that seperates the two. i was also raised on welfare, but I worked hard, got my education, and do very well now. it is the same for the poor.
DL - 09/07/07 9:07am
what happened with Sep 6 writing??? you just regurgitated some news articles. where are your comments, your thoughts? i just told meredith how much i enjoyed you and her blog because you both seemed to write more from the heart and cover more interesting topics. and then I see this – what’s up? as someone who just finished military stint and am renewing my ed, i am looking for this type of forum. get back to writing like you did before.
Kels - 09/26/07 8:53pm
Hi! I also suffered from your dilemma. Lettuce always looks so sweet and innocent... However, after a few months of surviving off of asparagus spears, I found the answer: I am a fruititarian, because I believe that vegetables have feelings!
thadius gladstone - 10/19/07 4:14pm
im a man and desire red meat not this crap!
An American - 11/01/07 4:56pm
I guess I need to make concessions for these people who squat on my property and demand that I give them food and water simply because they are there. Forget that they are trespassing on my private property, they have demands and I have to meet them, regardless of the fact they are violating federal law. It's the same here. We owe them nothing. They are not here legally, but I guess you don't understand what "ILLEGAL" is. It is a violation of the law. They are breaking a law, and the law itself is not stupid. We are a nation of laws. Their first mistake was to ignore the law, and it wasn't to escape certain death because of a bloody regime. They want to make money. Okay, do it legally. If you refuse, then leave. It has nothing to do with race. These people came here in violation of the law. Harboring them is also a violation of the law. Oklahoma is only trying to uphold federal law. If you have a problem with that, maybe you should reconsider your citizenship.
Post Comment

